Manchester City state they are “dissatisfied, but sadly not surprised” after being referred to Uefa’s financial control body adjudicatory chamber.
BBC Sport reported this week that Uefa private investigators desire City to be prohibited from the Champions League for a season if they are discovered guilty of breaking Financial Fair Play (FFP) guidelines.
Chief private investigator Yves Leterme has made his recommendation but it is not known if he supports a ban.
City said “the accusation of monetary irregularities remains totally incorrect”.
Former Belgian prime minister Leterme, chairman of the investigatory panel of Uefa’s independent financial control board (CFCB), and his group took a look at proof first exposed in a series of leakages published by German paper Der Spiegel in 2015.
The reports alleged that City broke FFP regulations by inflating the worth of a multimillion-pound sponsorship offer. City were fined ₤49 m in 2014 for a previous breach of guidelines.
It comprehended Leterme’s fellow board members firmly revealed the view at a recent conference that a season-long ban would be an appropriate penalty if City are condemned.
Uefa said Leterme, “after having sought advice from with the other members of the independent investigatory chamber”, decided “to refer Manchester City FC to the CFCB adjudicatory chamber following the conclusion of his examination”.
European football’s governing body said it “will not be making any further comment on the matter up until a choice is announced by the CFCB adjudicatory chamber”.
City, who won the Premier League for a 2nd year in succession last Sunday, have denied any wrongdoing.
” The leakages to media over the recently are indicative of the process that has actually been supervised by Mr Leterme,” checked out a City declaration.
” Manchester City is completely confident of a favorable result when the matter is thought about by an independent judicial body.
” The CFCB IC referral ignores a detailed body of irrefutable proof supplied by Manchester City FC to the chamber.
” The choice contains mistakes, misconceptions and confusions basically borne out of a fundamental absence of due procedure and there remain significant unsolved matters raised by Manchester City FC as part of what the club has found to be an entirely unacceptable, cut, and hostile procedure.”
It is unlikely any penalty for City will use to next season’s Champions League due to the fact that they could appeal, and even take their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
City might also quickly deal with a transfer ban, with the Football Association, Premier League and Fifa examining the club over the signing of youth players.
BBC Sport’s Simon Stone
About three weeks ago, Manchester City made a very in-depth submission that reached more than 100 pages.
It has not gone undetected by the club that it is five years to the day since Uefa revealed City had breached FFP rules and fined them ₤49 m, although City got ₤33 m back three years later on after they met guidelines.
According to CFCB’s own regulations, they can not bring prosecutions more than 5 years after the occasion.
In the referral it is comprehended the CFCB said that through their submission there are even more questions to be asked of City but, given that their submission, none of these questions has actually been put to the club.